As the politicians and their campaign teams
search deep into the backgrounds, comments, associates and unrehearsed gaffes
of their opponents, I can’t help but wonder, could God stand up to the scrutiny
of a political campaign?" What if instead of seeking the big picture, we
decided to define God by the worst sound bytes we could find?
Would we use I AM WHO I AM - or maybe the
equivalent I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE and I WILL BE WHAT THE FUTURE REQUIRES? Or
would we use something from this week's "Make me sick to my stomach"
reading from Exodus 12:1-14?
I know that Passover, a commemoration of
huge importance in Judaism and Christianity, is about the deliverance of the
Hebrew people out of bondage in Egypt. But right there near the end, the
description of God saying, “I will strike down every firstborn in the land of
Egypt.” Sounds like a sound byte any person who wants to paint God as something
horrible would jump at the chance to use. Can you imagine a Youtube clip of God
spouting threats of murder of every firstborn in Egypt? What candidate would
want to be associated with that? Can you imagine the reports that would say a
particular candidate wasn’t ‘thoroughly vetted’ and now the nastiness was going
to come out?
Sure, it’s possible to explain this week's
reading this way:
The people who experienced the events and
the ones who put together the Bible thought of the evil of slavery in Egypt in
very personal terms. And the only way they could understand combating that evil
was to experience God bringing judgment on the evil society.
But I have
great trouble separating a cultural understanding of the violence from the writers’
standpoint with my belief that killing,
murder, war. . . slaughter in the name of religion can never be excused. . . Never.
Never. Never.
Never.
No comments:
Post a Comment